I understand that, but I was curious why all the records loaded when I entered the W3CMN call in the box. I assume (please confirm) that it loaded all 5,351 records from the -03 database because I had registered both call signs for DXB 2004. The Operator Callsign field in the new -04 log is correct: first ten records are the W3 call and the rest are W1EBI. I just didn't want to have to delete all records and do it all again!
George -----Original Message----- From: Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:02 PM To: George Harlem, W1EBI; 'DXBase Reflector' Subject: Re: [DXBase] '03 to '04 imported database If you get a message during import that says "error" then the record was not imported. So, when you got 100 percent dupes, none of the dupes were loaded. Regards, Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Harlem, W1EBI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'DXBase Reflector'" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 7:20 PM Subject: [DXBase] '03 to '04 imported database > Jack/Courtney, I did my first import from DXB2003 to DXB2004. I have > ten records out of 5,351 from my old W3CMN callsign in the 1950's, the > rest are W1EBI (have to cover the deleteds). I chose "W3CMN" under > Operator Callsign for the import, and all 5,351 records were imported. > The Operator Callsign is shown correctly for all records. I expected > only the first ten records would be imported, then the remaining 5,341 > with the current call. A second import with "W1EBI" in the Op. Callsign > box produced 100% dupe errors. Duh. Is this a bug, did I do this > right, or is my DXB2004 .mdb hosed? It all LOOKS correct on the screen. > > George > > _______________________________________________ > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit: > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
