Sorry, didn't make myself clear. I was a beta tester for BOTH. LoTW and DXBase This was the only way I could fully test the features of both programs.
Actually I spoke to two of the guys, each at different times. LOL > Excuse the dumb question, Bill, but you said "I spoke with the team just > yesterday about this issue and was assured that it's on the list for the > next version of the software." So I ask which team and which software? I > assume you mean LoTW software/ team, but not sure. > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "FireBrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "DXBase List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 4:55 PM > Subject: [DXBase] incorrect LoTW data > > > > As one of the beta testers and just released from confidentiality, I found > the incorrect > > data issue a major headache. > > > > I can say with confidence that the error checking with regards to > callsigns, band, modes, > > time etc. are rock solid. > > I can also say with confidence that error trapping for county, states, and > unfortunately, > > zones is lacking. > > > > I spoke with the team just yesterday about this issue and was assured that > it's on the > > list for the next version of the software. > > The pressure was on to get the Awards module online. > > It will be a big money saver for both ARRL and DXCC participants. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > 50% of my forefathers were female. > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > > Bill H. in Chicagoland > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit: > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > > >
