I tried to be conservative and instead of blindly converting any PJ2/PJ7, post 10-10-2010 0400z, I used the list of known callsigns. Thats why I continually want more callsigns so I can add to the list. I do not know which is worse, to blindly decide any PJ2 is PJ2C and PJ7 is PJ7M or to leave them alone if I cannot decide what to do. I took the latter course but hope I can make it smarter!
73 Neal Campbell Abroham Neal Software www.abrohamnealsoftware.com (540) 645 5394 On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Don Gaikins <[email protected]>wrote: > I have been watching the reflector comments about the updater and > waiting until several people had used it before I finally applied it. > > It went very smooth except for one strange thing. Some stations signing > pj/their call are left at the old pj2 Netherland Antellies. Others were > correctly changed! I can not see any rime or reason for that, but it > did not take much to make the manual corrections. > > I did this on two different computers, both running XP with the same > results. > > This is not a complaint, just a comment. > > Don Gaikins > W0VM > ______________________________________________________________ > Dxbase mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Dxbase mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
