On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:16 AM, David Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andrew,
> 
> Have you had a chance to take a look at this?


Thanks for the reminder. It looks like we have a conflict of desires going on 
inside of Dyninst. The "isStopped" method returns true if the user explicitly 
requests the process to be stopped, but false if it stopped for some other 
reason (e.g. handling a signal). 

As a quick fix, can you just comment out the isStopped check in 
BPatch_process::oneTimeCode? The ProcControl layer will handle things 
appropriately. 

Drew

--
Andrew Bernat
Paradyn Project
[email protected]
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~bernat




_______________________________________________
Dyninst-api mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api

Reply via email to