On 04/25/2016 10:58 AM, Bill Williams wrote: > I think what we want to maintain, at least for 9.x, is the following > guidelines: > > * No "using namespace" in public headers (foo/h/*.h); "using foo::bar" > may be used but prefer typedefs if you want to clean up overly long > namespace chains > * Any of "using namespace foo", "using foo::bar", and "foo::bar" is > acceptable in private headers and source files (foo/src/*.[hC]). "using > foo::bar" or explicit "foo::bar" at point of use is preferred in the > absence of typedefs; typedefs and auto are the preferred options we > should trend towards in new code. > * If you're already touching a type, you may replace it with the most > preferred form (typedefs and auto to hide implementation details). > * If you see something unacceptable, fix it. > > This sound good to folks?
Works for me. _______________________________________________ Dyninst-api mailing list Dyninst-api@cs.wisc.edu https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api
