Anyone see this article.... it's in the washington post and is linked from 
wired.com
so I imagine a fair number of people who have not heard of e-gold have seen 
it.

It is definetly grossly inaccuracte in several places, in fact it mentions 
e-gold and says that e-gold is going to be opening another system called 
goldmoney....I thought (and I hope) that they are two totally different 
companies.....especially with some of the complaints and such I'm seeing on 
here...this market desperately needs more competitors....it also neglects to 
mention that e-gold is already active..even though it links to the e-gold 
site (these journalists are such great researchers)...but anyway here is the 
webpage and the article

http://www.washtech.com/news/media/5724-1.html


Gold: The New E-Currency?
By Steve Gold
Tuesday, December 5, 2000; 10:39 AM

A leading e-commerce expert has predicted that gold, the world's oldest 
method of monetary exchange after bartering, could soon appear online as 
digital gold. 
In his study on the current state of play in the e-commerce marketplace, 
Richard W. Rahn, an expert on the development of digital money systems, said 
that digital gold could be cheap to implement as a means of online exchange. 

"Digital gold-backed bonds or other digital gold instruments could have 
significant advantages over the use of established currencies," he said. 

Rahn says that the e-gold group (http://www.e-gold.com ) is already preparing 
to offer a digital gold system on the Web. Known as GoldMoney, the system is 
due to start shortly," he said. 

In his report, prepared for the World Gold Council, and entitled "Digital 
Money & Its Impact on Gold," Rahn acknowledges that digital- gold also faces 
obstacles. 

Currently, he said, very few e-commerce or physical world businesses accept 
gold in exchange for goods and services, and there is a need to establish 
widespread confidence in the financial integrity of a gold currency system. 

In some cases this will need a digital gold currency to be fully backed by 
physical gold, otherwise it is unlikely to attract and retain the confidence 
of users, unless it is underwritten by an established financial institution 
of unquestioned strength. 

The advantage of digital gold, he went on to say, is that many people 
instinctively trust it. 

"It is tangible, free of government control and the idea that gold is 
intrinsically valuable is ingrained in folk history. Thus, a digital currency 
perceived to be adequately backed by gold would have an automatic advantage 
in competing for people's trust over many other currencies," he said. 

The second important advantage of gold as a digital currency, he went on to 
say, is the substantial demand that already exists for holding gold assets 
for purposes other than as a medium of exchange. 

"This pre-existing demand for gold assets gives gold an important head start 
over all competitors, except major national currencies," he said, adding 
that, like the US dollar, gold is recognized worldwide as a store of value. 

"This certainly makes digital gold a candidate as an international digital 
medium of exchange," he said. 

In his report, Rahn argues that the real questions are not whether there will 
be digital money, but how long will it be before most paper currency and coin 
is eliminated, what portion of digital money will be issued by private 
institutions (as against governments and central banks today), and how much 
of that will be gold. 

Digital money, he predicts, will eventually become the dominant form of money 
because it is less costly to handle than cash, checks, or credit cards, and 
it is more secure and efficient. 

Institutions that currently own or produce gold, he said, are logical 
developers and marketers of digital gold products. 

"There are no longer technological reasons why private companies cannot 
create international gold-backed monies to compete with government-issued 
monies," he said. 

 



---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to