> Someone (Viking?) was implying that the ADS in magazines SUPPLEMENT
> magazines incomes -- ie, mazgines/newspapers get income from the
> cover price.
>
> That is not correct (the cover price is all-but irrelevant),
> magazines, like all media, are simply things that exist because of
> advertising. People sit down and go "whats a new way to sell ads -
> oh I know, we'll do a motorbike magazine / a business magazine / a
> women's magazine". It's not the other way around.
So your point is that all advertising outlets, magazines/radio/TV/web,
exist solely for the purpose of pushing more advertising. This isn't
neccesarily true for *all* magazines, etc..., but let's go with it.
Magazines, etc... exist for the sole purpose of advertising.
You, and a few others, are rallying for e-gold to accept advertising.
Then, e-gold would exist for the sole purpose of advertising.
I don't think that Douglas sat down several years ago and thought "what's
a new way to sell ads - Oh, I know, we'll create a gold backed currency".
Viking Coder
________________
Worth Two Cents?
http://www.two-cents-worth.com/?VikingCoder
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
