> > "The only one who is currently an "ether gold" is OSGold." > > > > If they are not 100% backed, then I fully agree with you, but where is the > > evidence. It seems to me that we just don't know what OSGold is since they > > have not disclosed it. > > They have. They made a proud, high-faluting claim of being 150% backed. > Then they described what they actually meant when they said 150% backed; > 50% paper fiat cash, 50% paper gold certificates, 50% gold. Which means > they aren't 100% backed by hard gold. More to the point: they have no way to redeem anything. Without redemption "backing" is utterly meaningless. CCS --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
