> Alright, all you 'want ta hold e-gold back spend page purists'.
> What's the matter with that? SHOW ME THE PROBLEM! :)
>From someone who has done numerous back-to-back spends for a couple of hours
on end, I can give you my personal opinion that I want that confirmation
page to come up as quick as possible, without any delays. E-gold has
suffered tremendous growing pains in the past, so much so that e-gold
'spends' would not always complete. When the page timed-out, the user would
have to go check the history to make sure the spend did NOT go through, and
then re-do the spend. Moreover, because the system was slow, the history
wouldn't update immediately, either. Therefore, on one occasion, a spend
that I made, timed-out on the confirmation page, and did NOT show up in the
history. I RE-MADE the spend, only to find that I had double-spent. Needless
to say that the receiver did not return the extra spend. [Doesn't it always
seem to happen that way?]
I had thought that JP wanted the ads to go on the page used to 'fill-out'
the spend. Though I may have some objections to this, I certainly believe
that the Confirmation Page should NOT be touched.
Sincerely,
SnowDog
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
