> Subject: 
>         R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> 
> --- begin forwarded text
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:00:10 EDT
> Subject: The end of liberty
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Dear Friends:
> 
> Some of you may have thought some of our fears about the what the statists
> have planned to end our freedoms were exaggerated.  The following is from a
> UN report last week - unfortunately it shows that the paranoid were right.
> 
> The U.N. High Level Panel on Financing for Development
> Recommends Making Orwell's Big Brother Real
> 
> On June 25, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan provided the report of the High
> Level Panel on Financing for Development to the General Assembly.  He
> appointed the panel in December of 2000.  Annan considers the report a "sold
> piece of work" and commends the panel for the "energy, imagination and effort
> that they brought to their task."  The recommendations of this report will be
> considered at Conference on Financing for Development which will take place
> in Monterrey, Mexico between March 18 and March 22, 2002.
> 
> The report recommends the creation of an International Tax Organization (ITO)
> (pages 27-28, 64-66).  The ITO would "sponsor a mechanism for multilateral
> sharing of tax information, like that already in place with OECD, so as to
> curb the scope for evasion of taxes on investment income earned abroad."
> (page 28).
> 
> The OECD harmful tax competition would require targeted small low tax
> countries to routinely provide all financial information on citizens and
> investors in those countries to the 30 industrialized OECD countries.  The
> OECD initiative imposes absolutely no requirements whatsoever on the country
> receiving the information to take any steps to protect financial privacy and
> no requirement that any OECD country show any probable cause that wrongdoing
> has been committed before being provided the information.  Countries that do
> not comply with this total abrogation of financial privacy would be subject
> to extraordinarily brutal sanctions.  The OECD would not require its own
> members to comply with these rules.  Large countries, like the United States,
> that provide tax advantages to foreign investors and honor financial privacy
> of its citizens and investors (at least to some degree) would be exempt from
> the OECD rules but would not be exempt from the United Nations ITO rules.
> The proposed U.N. ITO would result in every U.N. member government having
> routine unqualified access to the financial information of the citizens of
> all U.N. member states.  It would undoubtedly result in governments receiving
> this information using it not only for tax purposes but for intelligence
> purposes and to oppress minorities and political opposition.
> 
> The report states:
> 
> "The taxes that one country can impose are often constrained by the tax rates
> of others:  this is true of sales taxes on easily transportable goods, of
> income taxes on mobile factors (in practice, capital and highly qualified
> personnel) and corporate taxes on activities where the company has a choice
> of location.  Countries are increasingly competing not by tariff policy or
> devaluing their currencies but by offering low tax rates and other tax
> incentives, in a process sometimes called 'tax degradation'." (page 65)
> 
> "It [the ITO] might engage in negotiations with tax havens to persuade them
> to desist from harmful tax competition.  It could take a lead role in
> restraining the tax competition designed to attract multinationals -
> competition that, as noted earlier, often results in the lion's share of the
> benefits of foreign direct investment accruing to the foreign investor."
> (page 65)
> 
> Tax competition is a highly desirable limit on the degree to which
> governments can tax and a check on the inefficiency and corruption of
> government.  Countries that wish to attract investment from abroad by
> providing low taxes have every right to do so and neither the U.N. nor the
> OECD should dictate tax levels to sovereign states.
> 
> "Another task that might fall to an ITO would be the development, negotiation
> and operation of international arrangement for the taxation of emigrants.  At
> present most emigrants pay taxes only to their host country, an arrangement
> that exposes source countries to the risk of economic loss when many of their
> most able citizens emigrate."  (page 66)
> 
> The idea that a government should be able to impose taxes on those that have
> emigrated from its jurisdiction is repugnant and a violation of fundamental
> human rights.  It rests of the premise that the state retains a right to the
> fruits of its national's labor and investment income even after they have
> emigrated.  It should be viewed as a violation of Article 13 of the Universal
> Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1948
> which states in relevant part that "[e]veryone has the right to leave any
> country."
> 
> The report recommends that a currency transactions tax or carbon (CO2) tax be
> imposed to finance the various schemes in recommends.  (pages 26-27)
> Providing the United Nations with the ability to directly tax the nationals
> of its several states would effectively create the first global government.
> It would commence a process of centralization similar to that currently being
> undertaken by the European Union and will necessarily exact a steep price in
> terms of reduced freedom and limits on U.S. national sovereignty.
> 
> The report recommends that foreign aid from developed countries be 0.7
> percent of GDP (or $70 billion for the U.S., a nearly 8 fold increase). (page
> 21)  The report endorsed steps to create a global council to promote global
> governance because "modern globalization calls for global governance." (pages
> 24, 26).
> 
> For more information contact:
> 
> David R. Burton 703-548-5868
> Richard W. Rahn 202-659-3200
> Dan R. Mastromarco 703-548-5868
> 
> Background Information on the U.N. High Level Panel on Financing for
> Development
> 
> The U.N. report is available at http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/a55-1000.pdf
> 
> On December 15, 2000 UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan appointed Ernesto
> Zedillo the former President of Mexico, to be the Chairman of the High Level
> Panel on Financing for Development to make recommendations to the United
> Nations International Conference on Financing for Development which will take
> place in Monterrey, Mexico between March 18 and March 22, 2002.
> 
> Also appointed to the High-Level Panel on Financing for Development were:
> 
> Abdulatif Al-Hammad, President, Arab Fund for Economic Development, Kuwait;
> David Bryer, Director of OXFAM, United Kingdom;
> Mary Chinery-Hesse, Former Deputy Director-General of the International
> Labour Organization, Ghana;
> Jacques Delors, former Finance Minister of France and President of the
> European Commission;
> Rebeca Grynspan, former Vice-President, Costa Rica;
> Aleksander Livshitz, Chairman of the Board of the Russian Credit Bank;
> Majid Osman, former Finance Minister of Mozambique, who now heads a
> commercial bank;
> Robert Rubin, former Secretary of the Treasury, United States;
> Manmohan Singh, former Minister of Finance, India; and
> Masayoshi Son, President and Chief Executive Officer of Softbank Corporation
> in Japan.
> 
> Background Information on the OECD Harmful Tax Competition Initiative
> 
> Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue is available for purchase
> ($16.00) and immediate download at:
> 
> http://www.oecd.org/../scripts/publications/bookshop/redirect.asp?231998041E1
> 
> This is the original OECD report that initiated the process.  It provides
> details of the initiative and the sanctions that would be imposed on small,
> low tax countries.
> 
> ---------
> 
> The OECD report Towards Global Tax Cooperation, Report to the 2000
> Ministerial Council Meeting is available at:
> 
> http://www.oecd.org/daf/fa/harm_tax/Report_En.pdf
> 
> ---------
> 
> The MOU that the OECD is seeking to impose on small countries can be found at:
> 
> http://www.oecd.org/media/release/nw00-123a.htm
> 
> ---------
> 
> The OECD blacklist can be found at:
> http://www.oecd.org/media/release/nw00-66a.htm
> 
> ------------
> 
> An informative web site on the issue, hosted by the Center for Freedom and
> Prosperity, is located at
> http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/Articles/articles.shtml.  This site
> contains press coverage on the issue, Congressional letters, links to
> articles and the like.
> 
> ---------------
> 
> Articles of particular interest include:
> 
> http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/Articles/tni12-18-00.pdf (Marshall Langer)
> http://www.heritage.org/library/backgrounder/bg1395es.html (Dan Mitchell)
> 
> --- end forwarded text
> 
> --
> -----------------
> R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
> "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
> [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
> experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to