The Snipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) They did not SPECIFICALLY target MLM/Gaming/Scam. MLM and Gaming are > mentioned. nowhere do I see the word scam in the prospectus. Of course they don't mention scams in a prospectus. But mentioning MLM and Gaming is exactly the same. How many MLM/Gaming 'opps' based on other GBC's turned out the be scams? 90%? 95%? Where in the prospectus do they tell you that they only target the 5 or 10% of legitimate ventures? Looking at the growth numbers they propose this looks even almost mathematically impossible to achieve if they only targeted the legitimate ones. > 2) If that were true e-gold would have been shut down long ago . First of all: governments work slow, so there is no guarantee yet that e-gold will not be shut down eventually. But the thing is: e-gold did explicitly support scams. It even did something against some scams (freezing accounts), so that may have saved them. Edwin PS: Even more interesting is the following phrase in their prospectus: "During the year 2000 e-gold experienced explosive growth, partly due to work done by the founders of pecunix incorporated." Now that we all know where this growth of e-gold came from, what does this mean? --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
