--- "SnowDog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> James, I appeal. I am not against a limit. But 2 is way too low.
>> Can I suggest 4 at least.
>
>10!!! I NEED 10!!!
>
>SnowDog
I must also object here jim. It is not uncommon for more then two discussions to be
happenning at the same time on the list. Aside from that, it is also not uncommon for
people to go back and forth on an issue, the recent debate of Pecunix is an example.
The only thing that I see a quota doing is limiting discussion which ironically
contradicts the idea of a discussion list. Am I wrong here?
Khurram
==
2 cents worth?
http://two-cents-worth.com/?135153
_____________________________________________________________
Get email for your site ---> http://www.everyone.net
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
