> >Good Point! Point conceded! They should change the wording.

> It seems that you have a theory on why the number 1,952,954.93 is
> different from the number 1,933,849.12
>
> Would you mind telling me, that theory.

JP, I conceded the point the last message!

I never read that balance sheet to indicate that they were referring to ALL
e-metal in circulation. I thought they were referring only to the e-metal in
ciruclation which was a LIABILITY of E-Gold LTD. I see now, how it's
unclear.

I had assumed, (quite naturally, I believe), that there ARE e-gold accounts
which are not listed as liabilities of E-Gold LTD. These accounts would be
assets of E-Gold LTD. However, these accounts could not be listed in the
Asset Column separately from that which is included in the Trust.

Craig



---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) 
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common 
viruses.

Reply via email to