what is wrong with a local government rating based on a proxy for water
outflow (e.g. area) to cover the costs of, for argument's sake, a scheme to
drain land, including your own? Ideally taxes should be proximate to the
benefits derived from the services provided, and under New Zealand law
(don't know about Australian states) the Rating Powers Act 1988, enables
local government an array of bases for charging, and under the Local
Government Amendment Act 1996 (number 3), local government is obligated to
recover the costs of its services in a way proximate to the distribution of
the benefits:

122F. Principles relating to funding of expenditure needs---The
 principles referred to in section 122E (1) (a) of this Act (which
 principles are not ranked in order of priority) are---
   ``(a) The principle that the costs of any expenditure should be
          recovered at the time that the benefits of that expenditure
          accrue:
   ``(b) The principle that, to the extent that any expenditure---
            ``(i) Is independent of the number of persons who benefit; or

            ``(ii) Generates benefits that do not accrue to identifiable
          persons or groups of persons; or
            ``(iii) Generates benefits to the community generally,---
           the costs of that expenditure should be allocated in a manner
          consistent with economic efficiency and appropriate to the
          nature and distribution of the benefits generated, which manner
          may require the use of rating mechanisms under the Rating
          Powers Act 1988:
   ``(c) The principle that the costs of any expenditure should be
          recovered from persons or categories of persons in a manner
          that matches the extent to which the direct benefits of that
          expenditure accrue to those persons or categories of persons:
   ``(d) The principle that the costs of any expenditure to control
          negative effects that are contributed to by the actions or
          inaction of any persons or categories of persons should be
          allocated to those persons or categories of persons in a way
          that matches the extent to which they contribute to the need
          for that expenditure.

David Hillary


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) 
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common 
viruses.

Reply via email to