Steve Schear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 09:40 AM 11/28/2002 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Two things, >> >>1) It doesn't take a genius to see that the two messages from Graham weren't >>actually from him. I wonder if it wouldn't have been appropriate to catch >>the messages and delete them before a war starts. > > > >How the hell do we know where the real Graham is ?!? > >Can any associates of Graham's give a consensus of his real address, fone >number or the like?
-Good question. Perhaps its time list members consider using PGP to -digitally sign their postings. Leading email programs can be -configured to -automatically verify signed messages from keys uploaded to a public key -server Using keyservers for signature verification wouldn't provide any particularly high security. Identities on a keyserver can be forged too. The only cryptographic information you should ever fully trust is information traceable to trusted out-of-band channels. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
