> 12. Khurram Khan complains of trademark assignments from G&SR > to e-gold, Ltd. I think, Khurram, that just because G&SR > registered the trademarks, they are not necessarily the > current owners. Trademarks are property, and if they have > assigned those trademarks, or sold them, to e-gold, Ltd., > that is well within their authority.
Yes Trademarks are property, just like the house you live in and the office you work in. Like buildings, trademarks have an official registry. The name on this registry is the actual entity that owns such property. If these trademarks have been sold to e-gold, Ltd. Then the official registry should reflect these changes. Since, the governing body of said trademarks seems to think that G&SR owns them, then G&SR does own them. After all, would you buy your house in my name? My point is that the e-gold website was doing fine before they added that line to the bottom on the site. There is already sufficient confusion about the "one in the same-ness" of e-gold, Ltd. and G&SR and this only helps to further that confusion. I consider it a risk to my gold that the "e-gold" name is actually owned by a second company. Even more than that, I consider it a risk that the access to my gold is actually controlled my a second company that I would rather not have anything to do with. Khurram Khan --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
