> Those who were involved in using Osgold surely new that this was a scam, and > had to end one day
I can't comment on that one, cause I never did get involved. Was too busy to recover from damages I had done to myself when ROFLMAO after I first came across the site. My argument however has always been that they were a scam but that you couldn't judge it form the onset just because someone offered 45%. Actually if memory serves right, it initially was $45% per three months, then 35% per month and in the end 45% per month. So if any exchanger would have adhered to the behaviour code of the 'wise' then there would have been no reason to shun OSgold because OSscam offered 45% per quarter. Not outright at least. The going argument here however was until recently that [1] it's been clear from before the creation of the universe that OSgold was a scam; and [2] 45% per month is devil's work and unnatural; and [3] exchangers that satisfied a market demand must have been the devil's spawns Slowly positions changed - especially today: [1] 45% per month is possible but can't be garanteed [2] exchangers that did it because the market demanded it are oportunists [3] the whole thing was a scam - for one reason or another And that, gentlemen, is almost the position I was on when we first started out. So, we are almost in agreement in all major points and the rest is basically a matter of opinon, personal experiences and judgment based on available data. So, congratulations everyone, we almost reached consensus here! Cheers Robert. budget & privacy website hosting http://www.cyberica.net budget & privacy domain registrations http://www.u2planet.com --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.