Hi don: lspci -s 0a:00.1 -n 0a:00.1 0200: 8086:10fb (rev 01)
After I modified the BIOS setting: VT-D : enable->disable Power management: Minimum Processor Idle Power State C6 State ->Non C State (Note: before install the NIC, these actions are not required ) The OS successfully loaded But I still can't get nic work: dmesg|grep ixgbe [ 7.387497] ixgbe: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver - version 2.0.44-k2 [ 7.387691] ixgbe: Copyright (c) 1999-2009 Intel Corporation. [ 7.387868] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) [ 7.388007] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 31 (level, low) -> IRQ 31 [ 7.388150] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 8.901638] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: HW Init failed: -15 [ 8.901776] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: PCI INT A disabled [ 8.901897] ixgbe: probe of 0000:0a:00.0 failed with error -15 [ 8.902031] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.1: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) [ 8.902163] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 39 (level, low) -> IRQ 39 [ 8.902302] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.1: setting latency timer to 64 [ 10.412968] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.1: HW Init failed: -15 [ 10.413125] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.1: PCI INT B disabled [ 10.413256] ixgbe: probe of 0000:0a:00.1 failed with error -15 I also checked the BIOS, it is quite new (08/16/2010,newer than BZ), the latest one is 10/14/2010 which fix some PXE bugs. Thanks jon -----Original Message----- From: Skidmore, Donald C [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 10:11 AM To: Jon Zhou; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ module type was detected. Hi Jon, I don't believe we have an X520 fiber product that isn't SFP+. But I could be wrong. If you get me the device ID I could tell you for sure. From looking at your lspci output below I think you could do it with: lspci -s 0a:00.1 -n Thanks, -Don >-----Original Message----- >From: Jon Zhou [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 5:59 PM >To: Skidmore, Donald C; '[email protected]' >Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ >module type was detected. > >Hi Don > >The nic is X520-SR2, I don't think it has SFP+ module? > > (I plug SR fiber into the port directly) > >Regards, >Jon > >-----Original Message----- >From: Skidmore, Donald C [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 11:29 PM >To: Jon Zhou; '[email protected]' >Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ >module type was detected. > > >Hi Jon, > >The original error message you mentioned "failed to load because an >unsupported SFP+ module type was detected." is triggered ixgbe not getting >the correct identifier back when it queries the NIC's EEPROM. Normally >this means just what the message says, you have a SFP+ module in the NIC >that isn't supported. > >Now in your case I'm not that sure as you also got the NMI error. > >I have a couple questions. > >- do you see the NMI error every time you boot? If so could you send us >some of the log like you did with the unsupported SFP+ message? > >- Have you tried loading without and SFP+ module in the system? Do you >still see the failure? > >- Have you tried updating your BIOS like it was mentioned in the BZ? > >Thanks, >-Don Skidmore <[email protected]> > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jon Zhou [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 6:27 AM >>To: Jon Zhou; '[email protected]' >>Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ >>module type was detected. >> >>I found a similar problem >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548198 >> >>Anybody knows reason? >> >> >>Thanks >>jon >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jon Zhou >>Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 5:37 PM >>To: Jon Zhou; '[email protected]' >>Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ >>module type was detected. >> >>When I reboot the machine >>It shows ixgbe: EEPROM is invalid followed kernel panic due to NMI. >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jon Zhou [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:38 PM >>To: '[email protected]' >>Subject: [E1000-devel] failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ module >>type was detected. >> >>Hi >> >>The X520 NIC was installed on a hypertown (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU >>E5440 @ 2.83GHz) and successfully loaded. >> >>It failed to init when I move it to a HP DL380(Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU >>E5540 @ 2.53GHz) >>And it report these errors: >> >>I can't understand what is the meaning of "failed to load because an >>unsupported SFP+ module type was detected." >> >>Thanks a lot! >> >> >>Oct 18 04:23:17 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2325.038363] Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI >>Express Network Driver - version 3.0.12-NAPI Oct 18 04:23:17 linaspl50 >>kernel: [ 2325.038371] Copyright (c) 1999-2010 Intel Corporation. >>Oct 18 04:23:17 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2325.038413] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: PCI >>INT A -> GSI 31 (level, low) -> IRQ 31 Oct 18 04:23:17 linaspl50 kernel: [ >>2325.038458] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 Oct 18 >>04:23:20 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2328.472454] ixgbe: 0000:0a:00.0: >ixgbe_probe: >>failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ module type was detected. >>Oct 18 04:23:20 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2328.472457] Reload the driver after >>installing a supported module. >>Oct 18 04:23:20 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2328.472479] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.0: PCI >>INT A disabled Oct 18 04:23:20 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2328.472499] ixgbe >>0000:0a:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 39 (level, low) -> IRQ 39 Oct 18 04:23:20 >>linaspl50 kernel: [ 2328.472529] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.1: setting latency timer >>to 64 Oct 18 04:23:24 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2331.895676] ixgbe: >0000:0a:00.1: >>ixgbe_probe: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ module type was >>detected. >>Oct 18 04:23:24 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2331.895678] Reload the driver after >>installing a supported module. >>Oct 18 04:23:24 linaspl50 kernel: [ 2331.895692] ixgbe 0000:0a:00.1: PCI >>INT B disabled >> >>linaspl50:~/ixgbe-3.0.12/src # lspci >>00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 5520 I/O Hub to ESI Port (rev 13) >>00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express >>Root Port 1 (rev 13) 00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 >>I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 2 (rev 13) 00:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel >>Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 3 (rev 13) 00:04.0 >>PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 4 >(rev >>13) 00:05.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express >Root >>Port 5 (rev 13) 00:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/X58 I/O Hub PCI >>Express Root Port 6 (rev 13) 00:07.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation >>5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 7 (rev 13) 00:08.0 PCI bridge: >>Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 8 (rev 13) >>00:09.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express >>Root Port 9 (rev 13) 00:0a.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 >>I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 10 (rev 13) 00:0d.0 Host bridge: Intel >>Corporation Device 343a (rev 13) >>00:0d.1 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 343b (rev 13) >>00:0d.2 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 343c (rev 13) >>00:0d.3 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 343d (rev 13) >>00:0d.4 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Physical Layer Port 0 >>(rev 13) >>00:0d.5 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 5520/5500 Physical Layer Port 1 >(rev >>13) >>00:0d.6 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 341a (rev 13) 00:0e.0 Host >>bridge: Intel Corporation Device 341c (rev 13) >>00:0e.1 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 341d (rev 13) >>00:0e.2 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 341e (rev 13) >>00:0e.3 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 341f (rev 13) >>00:0e.4 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 3439 (rev 13) 00:14.0 PIC: >>Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub System Management Registers (rev >>13) >>00:14.1 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub GPIO and Scratch Pad >>Registers (rev 13) >>00:14.2 PIC: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub Control Status and >RAS >>Registers (rev 13) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 >>Family) PCI Express Root Port 1 >>00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express >>Root Port 3 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 >>Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 >>00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI >>Controller #2 >>00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI >>Controller #3 >>00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI >>Controller #6 >>00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2 EHCI >>Controller #1 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev >>90) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801JIB (ICH10) LPC Interface >>Controller >>00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) 4 port >SATA >>IDE Controller #1 01:03.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc >>ES1000 (rev 02) 01:04.0 System peripheral: Compaq Computer Corporation >>Integrated Lights Out Controller (rev 03) >>01:04.2 System peripheral: Compaq Computer Corporation Integrated Lights >>Out Processor (rev 03) >>01:04.4 USB Controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Proliant iLO2/iLO3 virtual >>USB controller >>01:04.6 IPMI SMIC interface: Hewlett-Packard Company Proliant iLO2 virtual >>UART 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II >BCM5709 >>Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20) >>02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 >>Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20) 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom >Corporation >>NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20) >>03:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 >>Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20) 04:00.0 RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard >>Company Smart Array G6 controllers (rev 01) 0a:00.0 Ethernet controller: >>Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01) >>0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit Network >>Connection (rev 01) 14:00.0 RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company >>Smart Array G6 controllers (rev 01) >> >>jon >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- >>--- >>Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! >>Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by >>optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the >>Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. >>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev >>_______________________________________________ >>E1000-devel mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel >>To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit >>http://communities.intel.com/community/wired ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
