OK, thanks for the clarification.  We'll see if we can pick those up on our 
internal server, but just in case is there an external site where we can get 
them?

- Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Yeung [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:27 PM
> To: Rose, Gregory V
> Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; e1000-devel; Allan, Bruce W; Brandeburg, Jesse;
> Steve Sarvate
> Subject: Re: Question about ixgbevf driver
> 
> Greg,
> 
> Thank you for your help!
> We are running Oracle VM server release 3.0.3 and the  guest OS is  (
> Oracle ) Enterprise Linux Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Carthage).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David
> 
> 
> On 01/05/12 16:15, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > Just to clarify something.
> >
> > You're running Oracle Enterprise Linux 5 and the guest OS is Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux 5.5?
> >
> > We're having trouble reproducing this so I want to make sure we're using
> the right setup.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Greg
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Rose, Gregory V [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:06 AM
> >> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; [email protected]
> >> Cc: e1000-devel; Allan, Bruce W; Brandeburg, Jesse; Steve Sarvate
> >> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question about ixgbevf driver
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 7:58 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]; Rose, Gregory V
> >>> Cc: Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Steve Sarvate; e1000-devel
> >>> Subject: Re: Question about ixgbevf driver
> >>>
> >>> Adding e1000-devel mailing list as well as Greg Rose (ixgbevf
> >>> maintainer)...
> >>
> >> I've never noticed this before but then I can't say as how I was
> looking
> >> for it either.  Let me check it out and I'll get back to you.
> >>
> >> - Greg
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 17:26 -0800, David Yeung wrote:
> >>>> Hi  Bruce/Jeffrey/Jesse/,
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you do?
> >>>> We are using the  ixgbevf  driver ( version: 2.4.0-NAPI ) to test the
> >>>> VLAN interfaces of Twinville NICs inside the OEL 5 virtual machine,
> it
> >>>> looks like the bi-directional network traffic ran properly on the
> VLAN
> >>>> interfaces of Twinville NICs  inside the OEL 5 virtual machine for
> >>>> hours, but the ifconfig command reports strange amount ( it is 0 all
> >>>> the time )  of  RX packets and RX bytes of VLAN interfaces of
> >> Twinville:
> >>>>
> >>>> [root@Twinville_VM_156 ~]# ifconfig
> >>>> .........................................
> >>>> eth6.10   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr F2:54:11:05:72:7C
> >>>>             inet addr:192.6.10.156  Bcast:192.6.10.255
> >>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>             UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:9210  Metric:1
> >>>>             RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >>>>             TX packets:111332155 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> >> carrier:0
> >>>>             collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >>>>             RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2565278846027 (2.3 TiB)
> >>>>
> >>>> eth6.11   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr F2:54:11:05:72:7C
> >>>>             inet addr:192.6.11.156  Bcast:192.6.11.255
> >>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>             UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:9210  Metric:1
> >>>>             RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >>>>             TX packets:111289098 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> >> carrier:0
> >>>>             collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >>>>             RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2562582125939 (2.3 TiB)
> >>>>
> >>>> eth6.12   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr F2:54:11:05:72:7C
> >>>>             inet addr:192.6.12.156  Bcast:192.6.12.255
> >>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>             UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:9210  Metric:1
> >>>>             RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >>>>             TX packets:111287930 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> >> carrier:0
> >>>>             collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >>>>             RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2564949229588 (2.3 TiB)
> >>>>
> >>>> eth6.13   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr F2:54:11:05:72:7C
> >>>>             inet addr:192.6.93.156  Bcast:192.6.93.255
> >>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>             UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:9210  Metric:1
> >>>>             RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >>>>             TX packets:111070858 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> >> carrier:0
> >>>>             collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >>>>             RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2566358628283 (2.3 TiB)
> >>>>
> >>>> eth6.14   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr F2:54:11:05:72:7C
> >>>>             inet addr:192.6.14.156  Bcast:192.6.14.255
> >>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>             UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:9210  Metric:1
> >>>>             RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >>>>             TX packets:111362848 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> >> carrier:0
> >>>>             collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >>>>             RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2566349976603 (2.3 TiB)
> >>>> .........................................
> >>>>
> >>>> [root@Twinville_VM_156 ~]# ethtool -i eth6
> >>>> driver: ixgbevf
> >>>> version: 2.4.0-NAPI
> >>>> firmware-version: N/A
> >>>> bus-info: 0000:00:09.0
> >>>> [root@Powerville_VM_156 ~]#
> >>>>
> >>>> [root@Twinville_VM_156 ~]# cat   /etc/*release
> >>>> Enterprise Linux Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Carthage) Red
> >>>> Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga)
> >>>> [root@Twinville_VM_156 ~]#
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have any idea about this problem? Any workaround/fix for this
> >>>> problem?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> David
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >> ----
> >> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a
> complex
> >> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access
> to
> >> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
> >> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI
> infrastructure
> >> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> E1000-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
> >> To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit
> >> http://communities.intel.com/community/wired


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to