On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 16:31 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The check for length <= 0 is bogus because length is unsigned, and > network > stack never sends zero length packets (unless it is totally broken). > > The check for really small packets can be optimized (using unlikely) > and calling skb_pad directly. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemmin...@vyatta.com>
I just realized I had not responded to this updated patch. Thanks Stephen, I have dropped your previous 2 patch series and added this patch to my queue.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
