> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Assmann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:09 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> Cc: [email protected]; Brandeburg, Jesse; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Nelson, Shannon; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; e1000-
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [net-next v2 3/8] i40e: driver ethtool core
> 
> On 23.08.2013 04:15, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Jesse Brandeburg <[email protected]>
> >
> > This patch contains the ethtool interface and implementation.
> >
> > The goal in this patch series is minimal functionality while not
> > including much in the way of "set support."
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +#define I40E_QUEUE_STATS_LEN(n) \
> > +  ((((struct i40e_netdev_priv *)netdev_priv((n)))->vsi-
> >num_queue_pairs + \
> > +    ((struct i40e_netdev_priv *)netdev_priv((n)))->vsi-
> >num_queue_pairs) * 2)
> > +#define I40E_GLOBAL_STATS_LEN      ARRAY_SIZE(i40e_gstrings_stats)
> > +#define I40E_NETDEV_STATS_LEN   ARRAY_SIZE(i40e_gstrings_net_stats)
> > +#define I40E_VSI_STATS_LEN(n)   (I40E_NETDEV_STATS_LEN + \
> 
> Please use tabs for spacing here.

Yep.

> 
> > +                            I40E_QUEUE_STATS_LEN((n)))
> > +#define I40E_PFC_STATS_LEN ( \
> > +           (FIELD_SIZEOF(struct i40e_pf, stats.priority_xoff_rx) + \
> > +            FIELD_SIZEOF(struct i40e_pf, stats.priority_xon_rx) + \
> > +            FIELD_SIZEOF(struct i40e_pf, stats.priority_xoff_tx) + \
> > +            FIELD_SIZEOF(struct i40e_pf, stats.priority_xon_tx) + \
> > +            FIELD_SIZEOF(struct i40e_pf, stats.priority_xon_2_xoff)) \
> > +            / sizeof(u64))
> > +#define I40E_PF_STATS_LEN(n)    (I40E_GLOBAL_STATS_LEN + \
> 
> Here as well.

Yep.

> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static void i40e_get_regs(struct net_device *netdev, struct
> ethtool_regs *regs,
> > +                     void *p)
> > +{
> > +   struct i40e_netdev_priv *np = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > +   struct i40e_pf *pf = np->vsi->back;
> > +   struct i40e_hw *hw = &pf->hw;
> > +   u32 *reg_buf = p;
> > +   int i, j, ri;
> > +   u32 reg;
> > +
> > +   /* Tell ethtool which driver-version-specific regs output we have.
> > +    *
> > +    * At some point, if we have ethtool doing special formatting of
> > +    * this data, it will rely on this version number to know how to
> > +    * interpret things.  Hence, this needs to be updated if/when the
> > +    * diags register table is changed.
> > +    */
> > +   regs->version = 1;
> > +
> > +   /* loop through the diags reg table for what to print */
> > +   ri = 0;
> > +   for (i = 0; i40e_reg_list[i].offset != 0; i++) {
> > +           for (j = 0; j < i40e_reg_list[i].elements; j++) {
> > +                   reg = i40e_reg_list[i].offset
> > +                           + (j * i40e_reg_list[i].stride);
> > +                   reg_buf[ri++] = rd32(hw, reg);
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return;
> 
> void function, no return necessary.

Thanks

> 
> > +}
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static void i40e_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *netdev,
> > +                              struct ethtool_stats *stats, u64 *data)
> > +{
> > +   struct i40e_netdev_priv *np = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > +   struct i40e_vsi *vsi = np->vsi;
> > +   struct i40e_pf *pf = vsi->back;
> > +   struct rtnl_link_stats64 *net_stats =
> i40e_get_vsi_stats_struct(vsi);
> > +   char *p;
> > +   int i, j;
> > +
> > +   i40e_update_stats(vsi);
> > +
> > +   i = 0;
> 
> This could be avoided by int i = 0 few lines above.

Sure.

> 
> > +   for (j = 0; j < I40E_NETDEV_STATS_LEN; j++) {
> > +           p = (char *)net_stats +
> i40e_gstrings_net_stats[j].stat_offset;
> > +           data[i++] = (i40e_gstrings_net_stats[j].sizeof_stat ==
> > +                   sizeof(u64)) ? *(u64 *)p : *(u32 *)p;
> > +   }
> > +   for (j = 0; j < vsi->num_queue_pairs; j++) {
> > +           data[i++] = vsi->tx_rings[j].tx_stats.packets;
> > +           data[i++] = vsi->tx_rings[j].tx_stats.bytes;
> > +   }
> > +   for (j = 0; j < vsi->num_queue_pairs; j++) {
> > +           data[i++] = vsi->rx_rings[j].rx_stats.packets;
> > +           data[i++] = vsi->rx_rings[j].rx_stats.bytes;
> > +   }
> > +   if (vsi == pf->vsi[pf->lan_vsi]) {
> > +           for (j = 0; j < I40E_GLOBAL_STATS_LEN; j++) {
> > +                   p = (char *)pf + i40e_gstrings_stats[j].stat_offset;
> > +                   data[i++] = (i40e_gstrings_stats[j].sizeof_stat ==
> > +                              sizeof(u64)) ? *(u64 *)p : *(u32 *)p;
> > +           }
> > +           for (j = 0; j < I40E_MAX_USER_PRIORITY; j++) {
> > +                   data[i++] = pf->stats.priority_xon_tx[j];
> > +                   data[i++] = pf->stats.priority_xoff_tx[j];
> > +           }
> > +           for (j = 0; j < I40E_MAX_USER_PRIORITY; j++) {
> > +                   data[i++] = pf->stats.priority_xon_rx[j];
> > +                   data[i++] = pf->stats.priority_xoff_rx[j];
> > +           }
> > +           for (j = 0; j < I40E_MAX_USER_PRIORITY; j++)
> > +                   data[i++] = pf->stats.priority_xon_2_xoff[j];
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return;
> 
> Another void function.

Yep.

> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static struct ethtool_ops i40e_ethtool_ops = {
> > +   .get_settings           = i40e_get_settings,
> > +   .get_drvinfo            = i40e_get_drvinfo,
> > +   .get_regs_len           = i40e_get_regs_len,
> > +   .get_regs               = i40e_get_regs,
> > +   .nway_reset             = i40e_nway_reset,
> > +   .get_link               = ethtool_op_get_link,
> > +   .get_wol                = i40e_get_wol,
> > +   .get_ringparam          = i40e_get_ringparam,
> > +   .set_ringparam          = i40e_set_ringparam,
> > +   .get_pauseparam         = i40e_get_pauseparam,
> > +   .get_msglevel           = i40e_get_msglevel,
> > +   .set_msglevel           = i40e_set_msglevel,
> > +   .get_rxnfc              = i40e_get_rxnfc,
> > +   .set_rxnfc              = i40e_set_rxnfc,
> > +   .self_test              = i40e_diag_test,
> > +   .get_strings            = i40e_get_strings,
> > +   .set_phys_id            = i40e_set_phys_id,
> > +   .get_sset_count         = i40e_get_sset_count,
> > +   .get_ethtool_stats      = i40e_get_ethtool_stats,
> > +   .get_coalesce           = i40e_get_coalesce,
> > +   .set_coalesce           = i40e_set_coalesce,
> > +   .get_ts_info            = i40e_get_ts_info,
> > +};
> 
> It would be nice if you could use tabs for spacing here.

Sure.

> 
>   Stefan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and 
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, 
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. 
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to