On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:48:37 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 18:34 +0100, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Hardware may fail to report time stamp e.g.:
> > - when hardware time stamping is not enabled
> > - when time stamp is requested shortly after ifup
>
> trivia:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> []
> > @@ -1155,6 +1155,12 @@ static void e1000e_tx_hwtstamp_work(struct
> > work_struct *work)
> > skb_tstamp_tx(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb, &shhwtstamps);
> > dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb);
> > adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb = NULL;
> > + } else if (time_after(jiffies, adapter->tx_hwtstamp_start
> > + + adapter->tx_timeout_factor * HZ)) {
> > + dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb);
> > + adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb = NULL;
> > + adapter->tx_hwtstamp_timeouts++;
> > + e_warn("clearing Tx timestamp hang");
>
> Missing \n termination
I copied that line from ixgbe and assumed that the magic macro adds
termination...
I see that igb and i40e also lack the \n on similar messages. Can I fix
them all in a single follow-up patch?
Thanks for catching this.
-- kuba
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
