Hi,

   Thanks for your reply. It looks great. However I found out the speed of
grid are a bit slow compare to SmartGWT.
Can we write client logic in Java and let the compiler translate that to
JavaScript ? some things like GWT.

   j2s looks good as well. only the UI looks a bit Win9x.

Thanks

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:34 AM, RĂ¼diger Herrmann <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 09.02.2010 00:37, Ivan Ooi wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>   Thanks for the reply. sorry about that. Ya, RAP are filling the gape
>> for this area. Sorry, I forgot about RAP project. This is great....
>> About RAP, Can I simply use RWT instead of RCP ? Sorry for my stupid
>> questions...
>>
> Put simply, you can use RWT instead of SWT and (with some limitations) let
> the RCP/e4 workbench run on top of it.
> See here for a more detailed introduction to RAP:
>  http://eclipse.org/rap/introduction.php
>
>
>> Thanks again! Good to hear that SWT now exist in Web platform as well.
>> Best is it use back Java language.
>>
>> Oh ya! can I use Java in RWT client side for logic ?
>>
>> Thanks and Best Regards,
>> Ivan
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Muskalla
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>    Hi,
>>
>>    as Lars already pointed out, the RAP project already allows you to
>>    single-source your existing code to bring your RCP application to
>>    the web (see eclipse.org/rap <http://eclipse.org/rap> ). The
>>
>>    problems Tom mentioned are real, but only some of them. Eg. the
>>    event-loop is part of RAP for several releases and has proven to
>>    work efficiently in a server-centric environment. Operating system
>>    resources are available too (eg. Fonts, Cursors, etc). The only
>>    missing part is a proper GC implementation which heavily relies on
>>    the capabilities of modern browsers but depending on your task at
>>    hand you could use the RAP theming to customize the look and feel of
>>    the application (eg. roundend corners or gradients).
>>
>>    Hope that helps,
>>      Ben
>>
>>    Ivan Ooi wrote:
>>
>>        Hi,
>>
>>           But.... we can't port our existing code over :-( at least in
>>        certain percentage or degree .. :-(
>>        Thanks
>>
>>        On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:33 AM, <[email protected]
>>        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>
>>        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>
>>         > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tom Schindl
>>         > <[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>>        <mailto:[email protected]
>>        <mailto:[email protected]>>>wrote:
>>
>>         >
>>         >> Hi,
>>         >>
>>         >> Doing a full SWT-Port for the Web is a very hard task because
>>            some of
>>         >> the concepts in SWT can't be emulated easily on the browser:
>>         >>
>>         >> * Event-Loop: Todays browser though HTML5 brings webworkers are
>>            still
>>         >>  single threaded and so you can't e.g open blocking dialogs
>>        like you
>>         >>  do in SWT => SWT would have to introduce API with callbacks so
>>         >>  that one could write single-source code.
>>         >>
>>         >>  An example might make this clear:
>>         >>
>>         >>  Today:
>>         >>  ----------8<----------
>>         >>  MessageBox msg = new MessageBox(parent,SWT.ICON_ERROR);
>>         >>  msg.setText("I'm the message");
>>         >>  msg.open();  // Blocking call
>>         >>  System.out.println("I'm running after dialog closed");
>>         >>  ----------8<----------
>>         >>
>>         >>  In Future:
>>         >>  ----------8<----------
>>         >>  MessageBox msg = new MessageBox(parent,SWT.ICON_ERROR);
>>         >>  msg.setText("I'm the message");
>>         >>  msg.open(new Runnable() {
>>         >>    public void run() {
>>         >>      System.out.println("I'm running after dialog closed");
>>         >>    }
>>         >>  });
>>
>>            It is exactly one of benefice of using XWT: physical
>>        separation between
>>            event handling and UI. XWT can manage the both cases
>>        transparently.
>>            We can
>>            define the event handling policy (sync, async and delayed
>>        async) between
>>            declarative UI and event handling based on Java Handling,
>> Bundle
>>            service,
>>            web service etc.
>>
>>            yves
>>
>>
>>            _______________________________________________
>>            e4-dev mailing list
>>        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>>
>>        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        e4-dev mailing list
>>        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    e4-dev mailing list
>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> e4-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

Reply via email to