I think a MWizard is an excellent idea but do we need MWizardPages? Having
wizard pages is specific to an implementation of a wizard.
Cheers,
Wim
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at>wrote:
> The concept is universal and has nothing to do with SWT / JFace.
>
> MDialog extends MPart {
>
> }
>
> MWizard extends MElementContainer<MWizardPage> {
>
> }
>
> MWizardPage {
>
> }
>
> MPart extends MWizardPage, .... {
>
> }
>
> Hack you could even see a wizard to be a specialication of
> MPartStackContainer!
>
> Tom
>
> On 09.10.13 14:40, Marc Teufel wrote:
> > Are you sure that this is really more consistent ? Dont forget: Wizards
> > for instance are a JFace-specific kind of thing and i always thought the
> > application model itself should be independent of SWT, JFace. Or do you
> > think of a more abstract way of integration and if yes how this could
> > look like?
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/9 Lars Vogel <lars.vo...@gmail.com <mailto:lars.vo...@gmail.com
> >>
> >
> > Having dialogs and wizards in the model would definitely be more
> > consistent IMHO.
> >
> > Am 09.10.2013 11:50 schrieb "Tom Schindl"
> > <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at <mailto:tom.schi...@bestsolution.at>>:
> >
> > On 07.10.13 16:50, Markus A. Kuppe wrote:
> > > On 10/07/2013 04:37 PM, Lars Vogel wrote:
> > >> I personally think the lack of Pojo programming support for
> > the Eclipse IDE
> > >> is preventing a larger ecosystem to provide Eclipse 4
> > extensions. So your
> > >> work started for POJO views in
> > >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=356511 was
> > really great.
> > >> Having the same of handlers would help. Maybe it could be
> > used to build a
> > >> perspective switcher which works in the IDE and the RCP
> > applications.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the same goes for PreferencePages. Ideally, the preference
> > page extesion
> > > point ("org.eclipse.ui.preferencePages") would accept POJOs
> > and not just
> > > instances implementing
> > org.eclipse.ui.IWorkbenchPreferencePage (similar
> > > to bug #356511).
> >
> > Before doing this I'd like us to discuss in more general if
> Dialog &
> > Wizards should not get part of the model!
> >
> > Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > e4-dev mailing list
> > e4-dev@eclipse.org <mailto:e4-dev@eclipse.org>
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > e4-dev mailing list
> > e4-dev@eclipse.org <mailto:e4-dev@eclipse.org>
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mail: teufel.m...@gmail.com <mailto:teufel.m...@gmail.com>
> > Web: http://www.teufel.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > e4-dev mailing list
> > e4-dev@eclipse.org
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing list
> e4-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
