This was suggested in the past and the general consensus was that we should use the platform HIPP as long as we see no resource issues. Every HIPP costs the foundation extra money.
+1 for moving the e4 and the platform build to Hudson. AFAIK the process in currently controlled by a cron job. Best regards, Lars Am 23.01.2015 16:01 schrieb "Mickael Istria" <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > As I commented on https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=420141 , > I'd like to have multiple simple Hudson jobs for e4 snapshots, as an > addition to current build process. > Since e4 is an incubator, it has much different constraints than Platform, > so I find it better to have different Hudson for Platform and e4, just like > there are different download areas and different project pages... > > So I'd like to request a dedicated HIPP instance for e4. Is anyone against > it? If not, I'll open a request and ask e4 lead to give a +1, so webmaster > would be able to provide a HIPP for e4. > > Cheers, > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools> > My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets > <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria> > > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
