> i'm trying to get my dlink 200i to work with
> eagle-usb-1.9.8 and fc2. it's got vendor id,1110, prod
> id 900f. i use a pppoe connection which i know to have
It seems to me that it is allready in the eagle-usb.usermap file.
> to get past the above issue, i changed > to >= and
> then the build finished. but i saw the following
You resolved it right. I posted a similar patch and some
informations (for 1.9.7) on the wikki at:
http://dev.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=IntFedoraUs
> This includefile is not available on all
> architectures.
> /usr/include/asm/bitops.h:328:2: warning: #warning
> Using kernel headers in userspace: atomicity not
> guaranteed
>
> so that worried me a lot. i then proceeded with my
I also see that in fedora core 2 and fedora development but
it didn't worried me :).
> looking at my dmesg, i see:
>
> [eagle-usb] New USB ADSL device detected, waiting for
> DSP code...
> [eagle-usb] Interface 0 accepted.
> [eagle-usb] created proc entry at :
> /proc/driver/eagle-usb/002-003
> floppy0: no floppy controllers found
> [eagle-usb] ioctl EU_IO_OPTIONS received
> [eagle-usb] ioctl EU_IO_DSP received
> [eagle-usb] Loading DSP code to device...
> [eagle-usb] DSP code successfully loaded to device
> Badness in wait_ms at
> /root/eagle-usb-1.9.8/driver/macros.h:133
> Stack pointer is garbage, not printing trace
> [eagle-usb] ioctl EU_IO_OPTIONS received
> [eagle-usb] ioctl EU_IO_DSP received
> [eagle-usb] Loading DSP code to device...
> [eagle-usb] DSP code successfully loaded to device
For me the 'Badness in wait_ms' happens here
> [EAGLE-USB] EU_IO_GETIF: eth not yet created !!
Instead I have:
[eagle-usb] Modem operational !!
> The part above about stack pointer is garbage really
> worries me. For further information, i ran eagle diag
I see also that and I reported it, sleeper is working on that. It
shouldn't be problematic.
> [EAGLE-USB] EU_IO_GETIF: eth not yet created !!
>
> btw, my lsusb output for my usb modem:
> Bus 002 Device 002: ID 1110:900f Analog Devices
> Canada, Ltd (Allied Telesyn) AT-AR215 DSL Modem
I don't remember well, but at some point I noticed that there first the
modem reports an ID, gets some DSP and changes ID. Maybe the first ID isn't
recognized, or leads to a bad DSP being sent?
Pat
