On another level it would be great to have the current multiple output paths be extended to have a different classpath as well. My example is a team that develops a framework and an application at the same time. Due to the obvious package dependencies the framework should not have access to the application classes. At the very least a dependencies of output path would be great. app output classes depends on fw output classes but not the contrary. It is not a biggy since we can use an ant build process to inforce that however ... ;-)
Jacques "Radu Zaharia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message adq87c$3is$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:adq87c$3is$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I'm evaluating Ariadna - build 629, and I find it a very impressive tool! > ...but I have the following problem: > > I have a J2EE project which contains an EJB sub-project and a Web > sub-project. I want to compile my EJB files directly in the directory where > the EJB classes are deployed: > %application_home%\ejb-module\ > and my Web files directly in the directory where the Web classes are > deployed: > %application_home%\web-module\web-inf\classes\ > > To achieve this, I created 2 source paths and I chose Output type = Multiple > output paths in Project Properties. One source path contains my EJB files > and has Output path = %application_home%\ejb-module\, the other contains my > Web files and has Output path = > %application_home%\web-module\web-inf\classes\. > > My problem is, Ariadna compiles the source files not in the directories I > mentioned above, but in > %ariadna_installation_home%\system\output\498d6120 ! Then I have to manually > copy the files in my two output directories. > > I mention that I have enabled Web application support and EJB integration in > Project Properties. > > What could cause my problem and how can I avoid it? > Thanks, > > Radu Zaharia > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
