For the writers of Sienfeld the rule was: "No hugging, no learning".

For the writers of Idea the rule should be: "Refactoring Editor; No GUI
builder, no Wizards".

Keep the rules in mind and you won't alienate your fans.

-Mark


"Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have heard a number of times from other people and I can say the same
> for myself that IDEA is often liked by people who generally DO NOT like
> IDEs which is definitely a sign of how much it stands out.
>
> --
> fedor
>
> Arun Batchu wrote:
> > There was an interesting thread on Borland's Jbuilder newsgroup praising
> > IDEA.
> > An interesting observation  made by one of the guys was :
> >
> > "Having just returned from JavaOne, I was surprised how much buzz there
was
> > over IntelliJ's IDEA Java IDE.  Even James Gosling (definitely an old
school
> > EMACS type coder) mentioned he had started working with IDEs and his
current
> > favorite was IDEA.
> > "
> >
> > Kudos guys and thanks for a wonderful IDE.
> >
> > arun
>


_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features

Reply via email to