Hello,

Well, it's not really a feature request, not really a bug... But anyway,
here it goes :
I was wondering why I had never had any history for my Java classes.
And finally, I know why. It's simply because I did not include my source
tree in my project path.
So there is a project path and a source path, respectively with a project
pane and a source pane.
My question is the following, why my classes in my source tree aren't
versionned and stored in my local VCS ?
I think it's clever to have in my project path all the stuffs related to my
Web app (including JSPs), and in my source path everything related to my
source files (Servlets, Beans, etc...). Isn't it the way it should be ? If
it's not, why is there a source pane if we have to include the sources in
the project path ?
Why should I include my source tree in my project path (in order to have it
version controlled) when it's already in my source path ?
Maybe some options or checkboxes should be included in the configuration
pane, like : source tree versionning, project tree versionning... etc...
Following the same idea, it'd be cool if we could exclude certain folder
from being versionned.
It was already in a previous request I made regarding compilation, finding
usages, refactoring : we should be able to hide/unhide sub-folders from the
project and/or source pane. Thus, we could have a fine-grained way of
choosing the files that need to be compiled, searched for usages,
refactored, AND versionned or not.

Guillaume


_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features

Reply via email to