+1
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Kirk Woll wrote:
> Often I expose getters and setters for my class that don't directly
> correlate to a variable. For example, I might have a class like this:
>
> class MyClass {
> private String[] lines;
>
> public String[] getLines() {
> return lines;
> }
>
> public void setLines(String[] newLines) {
> this.lines = newLines;
> }
>
> public List getLinesList() {
> return Arrays.asList(lines);
> }
>
> public void setLinesList(List newLinesList) {
> this.lines = (String[])lines.toArray(new String[0]);
> }
> }
>
> The easiest way for me to handle the second getter/setter pair would be if
> Idea had an "Introduce Property" refactoring where I can supply the property
> name and its type. Then I could just fill in the implementation. Right now
> I'm forced to add a field to my class (List linesList) and wrap the
> getter/setter around it. Then I have to remove the field and the
> implementations in the getter/setter. That seems like far too much trouble.
> :)
>
> Kirk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-features mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
>
_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
