Well, let it be only ascii and utf-8 plus a popup dialog asking to select encoding if it's not one of those two (configurable). This user selection could also be remembered somewhere.
-----Original Message----- From: "Guillaume Laforge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 17:00:30 +0200 Subject: [Eap-features] Re: Re: Improvement: make encoding detection intelligent, not based on assumptions > > > "Igor Karpov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ecrit dans le message news: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To start with, It would be enough to support autodetection of plain old > > us-ascii, utf-8 and the system default encoding. > > For instance, I use only those three. > > And, of course, it should be XML-friendly. > > Personally, I have some XMLs that are in UTF-8 and some are just without > any > > encoding (assuming us-ascii), and it's still a pain to edit UTF-8. Even if > I > > had Win2000(XP?) here with its mighty notepad, it would insert its 3 bytes > at > > the start that drive XML tools crazy... > > Hmm... that's the problem. > It's easy to guess when it's ASCII or UTF-8. But maybe we could assume that > chars between 128 and 255 are from the standard platform encoding (system > default encoding) ? KOIR-8 if you're Russin, ISO-8859-1 if you're European, > etc... > Some editors like UltraEdit seem to be quite good at guessing the encoding > of a file. > > Guillaume > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > ------------------------------------ Mail.Ru - ������, ��������, �������! ------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
