Hi Dimiter, > Tom, I do it with search and repalce (it's pretty safe :)
... as safe as using search and replace for renaming a class/method/field. Tom On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:41:49 +0300, "dimiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometimes you get enormous block of constants and much shorter body of a > class , and all these long names cause you verbosity-blindness. > > Tom, I do it with search and repalce (it's pretty safe :) > > -- dimiter > > "Pete Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Just curious. Why would you want to do this? The compiler puts the > > constant value in place of the constant "variable" so there is no > > performance gain. > > > > What you appear to want is that YES is like a #def in C/C++ and is > > inlined. This is not necessary in Java. > > > > Pete > > > > Oh yeah, -1 :-) > > > > Thomas Singer wrote: > > > > > Since months, I would like to have the option to inline constants -- > > > simply replacing their usage with their initialisation... > > > > > > Example: > > > > > > public static final Option YES = Option.YES; > > > > > > ... > > > setOption(YES); > > > ... > > > > > > ==> > > > > > > ... > > > setOption(Option.YES); > > > ... > > > > > > I know, I can do it with cut'n'paste, but I'm able to do each > > > refactoring with the help of cut'n'paste. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
