Even if we don't have any incremental compiler, it could still be possible
to parse all files in the background with a very little priority. Or when
the user hasn't issued any key stroke or mouse move.
It would be an option, of course, everybody doesn't want this feature to be
active :o)

Guillaume


"Jacques Morel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit dans le message news:
aidufk$n2i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +1
> However I would only should problems not the absence of problems:
> For example VAJ & Eclipse put in any iconic/title view of a file that has
> errors a red X next to it to signify that it has problems. Of course they
do
> incremental compile on save so it is very easy to maintain this info
> uptodate for them.
> However I think it is a powerful metaphor. In these IDEs you could do
impact
> analysis or navigate quickly to errors with that because even the packages
> would show a red X if they contains a package or a file with a red X.
> I would still want to have these kind of feedback on my overall project
even
> after a manually triggered compile and even if it might get stale. Each
time
> the developer will follow the red X/square trail and open a file with an X
> IDEA could reparse and potential remove the red X/square if it doesn't
need
> it.
>
> Jacques



_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features

Reply via email to