+1 to a global default. Hate to say it but JBuilder has done some things right :o)
Jacques Morel wrote: > +1 for both. Again maybe we need one global default (I guess for now the > default project if it works) and a project override. > > "Stef�n Freyr Stef�nsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > aidpvj$hvn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:aidpvj$hvn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> One more thing... I think the Code Style should definately be on a >> project basis as well... >> >> Thanks, Stefan Freyr. >> >> <sent> >> >> Stef�n Freyr Stef�nsson wrote: >> >> > Hi. >> > >> > Don't you agree that the class template should belong to the project >> > properties and not the IDE options? I know that I personally sometimes >> > use different class headings for different projects so I'd very much > like >> > to be able to define different templates on a project basis. >> > >> > Thanks, Stefan Freyr. >> _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
