Though it depends on your stance on morality ;)
"Michael Kirby"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Eap-features]
request for a singleton feature
tbrains.com
05/09/2002 17:16
Please respond to
eap-features
Singleton's are evil. Which is of course why we use them everywhere.
Mike
On 30 Aug 2016 at 27:03, FRANK wrote:
> It would be nice if a 'singleton' feature could be added.
>
> Idea would create automaticly the getInstance() method, the private
> static accessor...
>
> what about that ? (I guess some discution could be what should be the
> default implementation of the getInstance, what type of sync...)
>
> Nicolas FRANK
>
> -->> FREE Perl CGI scripts add WEB ACCESS to your
> -->> POP E-Mail accounts! Download today!! http://www.adjeweb.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-features mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
>
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the
subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
--
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or
distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
