As to workspace placement and control, I'm not sure which option you've proposed would be best. I think I'd be fine with just the single project window, but the idea of multiple windows for the same project has appeal as well. I'm sure JetBrains would come up with an excellent choice.
I think it would be best if workspaces were as sparse as possible and not just a paired down version of multiple projects. Otherwise, just use multiple projects. Jon Sam Wilson wrote: > I really like this idea... in fact, you can sort of achieve the same things > today by opening multiple instances of your project files. The only problem > is that this takes up a huge amount of resources. This feature would be > great as long as it doesn't require a new "instance" of IDEA running for > each "workspace". > > The question is, would the new workspace reside in a different frame, or be > accessed via a tab on the side or bottom, or even from a drop down off the > main toolbar? > > Another question: Would the workspace utilize the same source path, or would > it have a separate source path? There are benefits to both. If you use a > shared source path, files would be accessible from multiple workspaces > without a duplication of config/resources. Using separate source paths would > probably facilitate the "search in workspace" feature. Would it make sense > to possibly have each workspace attached to different debugging sessions? > This could be useful when working on apps that have to talk to each other. > Would that even be possible? > > Just tryin' to help flesh out the details... > > sw _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
