Maybe codestyle option "always specify 'this.' for fields" could help here? 

--
fedor.

----
You can't hold a man down without staying down with him.
                -- Booker T. Washington


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valentin Kipiatkov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Parameter Rename neglection
> 
> 
> We plan to finally fix this for Ariadna.
> 
> Best regards,
> Valentin Kipiatkov
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>  IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/
>  "Develop with pleasure"
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Graham Lea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:48 AM
> Subject: [Eap-list] Parameter Rename neglection
> 
> 
> > If I have a parameter p1 in a constructor, and a field 
> parameterOne, and I
> > change the name of the parameter (p1) to parameterOne as 
> well, previous
> > references to parameterOne should be changed to 
> this.parameterOne, but
> they
> > are not.
> > This holds true for all methods, come to think of it.
> >
> > Graham Lea
> >
> > --
> > Software Engineer
> > Forge Research Pty Ltd
> > Suite 116, Bay 9, Locomotive Workshop
> > Australian Technology Park, Cornwallis Street
> > Eveleigh NSW 1430 Australia
> > Phone: +61 2 9209 4152   Fax: +61 2 9209 4172
> > www.forge.com.au
> >
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message contains privileged and confidential 
> information intended
> > only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you are not the
> > intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or
> > take any action in reliance on it.  If you have received 
> this message
> > in error please notify the sender immediately.  Any views 
> expressed in
> > this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
> > sender specifically states them to be the views of another 
> (including
> > a Body Corporate).
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eap-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> 

_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list

Reply via email to