Valentin Kipiatkov wrote:
But -- this was requested often -- wouldn't it make sense, if the
SmartCompletion falls back to BasicCompletion if there are no smart
suggestions?
This might make understanding of SmartType completion harder for novice
users, I think.
So then how about adding "GeniusType" completion? ;-)P.S. I agree that such automatic mixing could be confusing to a novice, and that's why I'm suggesting the new GeniusType completion that leaves the original ones untouched. It could be off by default. It's documentation could explain it and suggest only enabling it after understanding/mastering the other completion types.
...and keeping the current SmartType and Basic completion? It's an approach I suggested yesterday that gives a new combination completion. Here it is again--
This "GeniusType" combination completion would be in addition to the current Basic & SmartType but build off them. I would consider mapping it to the Tab key. Here's one way it could work to deal with your original objection and satisfy my goal:
* 1st tab pressed-- invoke SmartType if anything matches type else invoke Basic on 1st tab
* 2nd tab pressed-- invoke Basic (if SmartType was successfully invoked on 1st tab)
Thanks,
Jon
