Hi Ward, And what about these M4 modules:
M4/1.4.17 M4/1.4.17-GCC-4.9.3-binutils-2.25 M4/1.4.17-GNU-4.9.3-2.25 I guess the first one can go (since it’s just a dependency to build binutils/2.25 as you mentioned below), but what’s the difference between GCC-4.9.3-binutils-2.25 and GCC-4.9.3-2.25? — Franky > Op 2-sep.-2015, om 14:42 heeft Ward Poelmans <ward.poelm...@ugent.be> het > volgende geschreven: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Backeljauw Franky > <franky.backelj...@uantwerpen.be> wrote: >> I’m wondering: why do I have both binutils/2.25 and >> binutils/2.25-GCC-4.9.3-binutils-2.25 (the same for Bison, flex, M4, zlib)? >> Are the non-GCC-versions actually used, or are they just dependencies needed >> to built the GCC-versions? > > binutils/2.25 is build with the system compiler and used to bootstrap > GCC. After that we build binutils/2.25-GCC-4.9.3-binutils-2.25 and use > it. Bison & co are deps needed to build binutils. > > In principle, you can delete binutils/2.25 (and deps). > > Ward
