On 06/04/2017 08:32, Åke Sandgren wrote:
Can we steal that text? We use HMNS so we need to change it accordingly
but having the details on what each toolchain consists of is a good idea.
See also http://easybuild.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Common-toolchains.html ?
K.
On 04/06/2017 06:13 AM, Jack Perdue wrote:
Howdy all,
At some point in the past year I blatantly lied to Kenneth
by claiming we had a web page that clearly explains to our
users what components are in each toolchain while we use
a flat (non-hierarchical) module naming scheme.
Since then I've/we've made such a page. :)
https://hprc.tamu.edu/wiki/index.php/SW:Toolchains
Does it make sense to EB builders? Would your
users understand it???? What could be done to
make it easier for users to grasp?
We have LOTS of novice users so its always
hard for me (who's been doing UNIX for 30+
years now) to relate what is important.
Thanks for any feedback (whether I agree or not),
