On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:04:14 +0000 Fotis Georgatos <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello all, > > while this topic is still on, here's a challenge for the community: > * can features like this be generalized at a deeper level, so that individual > easyblocks actually need NOT be extended in isolation, but rather have a > generic mechanism? (i am asking this because I don't imagine yet any obvious > answer...) > > However, I'd consider generalizing this kind of needs as a very desirable > approach, > to optimize against configuration clutter. We managed to make this work with a user-config.jam supplied to Boost build process, so hacking easyblocks was not needed. However if this pops up more often, some method to handle it would be welcome. -- Jurij Pečar HPC Engineer, IT Operations, IT Services EMBL Heidelberg, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany Room 13-401
