Hi Loris,
from what I can see, the 'problem' lies here:
sources = [{
'git_config': {
'url': 'https://github.com/nanoporetech',
'repo_name': name,
'tag': 'v%(version)s',
'recursive': True,
},
It is pulling down a tag-release and as far as I understand it, it might
be difficult to reproduce that download, specially with the 'recursive'
been set to 'True'. Thus, when I try it at a different time, the
check-sum might be different. So for that reason the program itself does
not have a checksum attached with it.
The checksum which is included in the EasyConfig file is the one from
the patch, as you might have spotted it.
That might also explain why it is using 'None'.
I hope that helps a bit and I am sure others can either give a more
detailed information, or correct me.
All the best from a grey London
Jörg
Am 10.02.25 um 12:16 schrieb Loris Bennett:
Hi,
From
dorado-0.9.0-foss-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1.eb
on the branch 'develop', I'm trying to create
dorado-0.9.1-foss-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1.eb
The original file contains
checksums = [
None,
'28942b7057af00c574a5e70d33a58b4036fd09ae0b041f45b67581c8dda832b1',
]
However, if I run EasyBuild with '--inject-checksums --force', I get
checksums = [
{'dorado-0.9.1.tar.gz':
'45bea782ed454c791a6b500cdd8e98c4de9f24115c1f8af48f36484c41cd3079'},
{'dorado-0.8.0_dont_install_external_libraries.patch':
'28942b7057af00c574a5e70d33a58b4036fd09ae0b041f45b67581c8dda832b1'},
]
Regarding the 0.9.0 version:
1. Why is 'None' used for the checksum for the tgz file?
2. Why aren't the file names used in the checksum list?
Cheers,
Loris
