Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> writes:
> Zach, thanks a lot for a self-contained test. Could you please provide us with > some more information about the platform where you tested ECL? I meanĀ at > leastĀ configuration flags, chipset, 32/64 bits, operating system and value of > *features* Sure, sorry for omitting that important info! I am running ECL from git://ecls.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/ecls/ecl with the last commit date of "Tue Sep 28 12:14:30 2010 +0200". I am building it on a 64-bit Core 2 Duo Linux (Ubuntu 10.04) system. I am not using any configuration flags. Here is the *FEATURES* list: (:LINUX :FORMATTER :LONG-LONG :UINT64-T :UINT32-T :UINT16-T :RELATIVE-PACKAGE-NAMES :DFFI :CLOS-STREAMS :CMU-FORMAT :UNIX :ECL-PDE :DLOPEN :CLOS :BOEHM-GC :ANSI-CL :COMMON-LISP :IEEE-FLOATING-POINT :PREFIXED-API :FFI :X86_64 :COMMON :ECL) Thanks, Zach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list