06.01.11, 01:04, "Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll" <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodono...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > It's only my opinion, I can't say for all Windows user, but I personally > > prefer just a .zip or .tgz archive. > > Installer doesn't make too much sense for me, and if there would be both > > installer and .zip available, I would choze .zip. > > Doing one or the other does not make a difference. I was in general reluctant > to distribute binaries for other reasons: difficult to assert the quality of > it, variety of possible builds, etc. > > What I mean, If other Wiindows users have the same opinion, you may save > > some efforts. > > The distribution of binaries is motivated by a general complaint of Windows > users that ECL does not provide self-installing executables and it is very > difficult to get running -- requires msys, mingw, or msvc, or something like > that. >
Ah, yes, having binaries would be great. If installer is no more difficult that just an archive, then OK. Best regards, - Anton ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
