On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon <
p...@informatimago.com> wrote:
>
> ECL could define that :unspecific doesn't make sense for types, and
> could define that it is mapped to NIL. ie. pathname-type could never
> return :unspecific (and similarly for other components).
That would be consistent with the fact that no file system routines accepts
:unspecific.
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
