On 27 February 2011 14:52, Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> writes: >> 2011/2/27 Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbr...@gmail.com>: >>> How should I make sure that the process finishes too? (I don't mind if >>> I have to wait for it: this doesn't need to run in parallel) >> >> Just a guess, but try changing ":wait nil" to ":wait t"? > > Surely that won't work? Won't that block and then I don't get to send it > any data? (I haven't tried this, but I'm not at a computer with ecl atm)
hmmm... Yes, I suppose you're right. OK, so it was a bad guess :) -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
