On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> In addition, there seems to be a problem with configure around line >> 9038; normally the test programs are surrounded by a check that skips >> them if the cross_config has a definition, but the test for >> HAVE___BUILTIN_RETURN_ADDRESS seems to miss this, so that a >> cross-compilation will always fail. > > Thanks for reporting. For such a clear case in which you have identified the > problem so perfectly it is generally more useful to submit a bug report -- I > am very disorganized and tend to forget emails, while the SF bug tracker is > always there to remind me how lousy a maintainer I am :-)
Hm, and indeed there has been a bug ticket opened for it. And it was closed in January. Looking at the latest git sources, I can't really see _how_ it's a fix, but I'm willing to give it a try if the git repo is relatively stable. You might want to consider a bugfix release, though. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
