On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 00:27:26 +0100 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I have produced some plots comparing the performance of > ECL with a recent copy of SBCL (the one that came with Ubuntu). The goal is > not really to compare implementations, but to see the evolution of ECL and > how it works in different modes: interpreted, multithreaded, compiled, etc. > > http://ecls.sourceforge.net/pictures/index.html > > There is still room for improvement :) Thanks for working on this, I since some time wanted to work on some benchmark suite to compare ECL compiled performance over time/releases; this is great. As you say improvement is always possible, but this will also permit to detect any future significant performance regression, which is already very nice. -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
