On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
<juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@cs.tamu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> A fresh update of my local copy of ECL CVS version shows a regression
>> involving macro expansion, GETHASH, SETF and HASH-SET.  In short, after
>> expansion, the arguments to HASH-SET seems to be switched.
>
>
> Thanks for reporting. The problem is not actually related to the hash
> functions. ECL now includes a tiny SETF form optimizer that simplifies some
> expressions, trying to reduce the number of LET bindings that are generated.
> Your macro reordered the list of arguments w.r.t the list produced by the
> get-setf-expansion and this confused the optimizer. I will upload a patch
> tonight.
>
> Juanjo
>

Hi Juanjo,
did you get a chance to commit the patch? It appears I may have missed it.

-- Gaby

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list

Reply via email to