On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:24:10 +0200 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have managed to code a couple of macros that do the equivalent of > RESTART-CASE in C. I believe the same thing can be done for HANDLER-CASE. > Could you guys have a look at the manual and tell me whether it looks fine > for regular use? > > http://ecls.sourceforge.net/new-manual/ (under I.6 Conditions) After thinking about it a bit, I think that it's hard to do anything better for C, especially for inline code. Perhaps that it'd be possible for <n> to be handled automatically from the macro such that it's not necessary to specify it, I'm not sure if it makes sense. The interface seems usable. I also noticed the similar handler-case related macros but I've not seen them in the conditions dictionary. I noticed that there's an extra { in the documentation synopsis: ECL_RESTART_CASE_BEGIN(env,names) { } ECL_RESTART_CASE(n,args) { { } ECL_RESTART_CASE_END; Is it voluntary to describe that multiple such clauses can exist? An alternative might be: ECL_RESTART_CASE_BEGIN(env, names) { } ECL_RESTART_CASE(n, args) { [...] } ECL_RESTART_CASE_END; Perhaps that there should be something mentioned about the env argument, and that a few spaces could cleanup the example code slightly... Thanks, -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
